Home General information Meet an expert
Home > Specialized information > Medical cannabinoids and disease > HIV/AIDS

Pharmacology of
cannabinoids

Medical cannabinoids
and disease
  Pain
  Cancer
  HIV/AIDS
  Muscle Spasticity
  Sleep disorders
  Neurological disorders
  Psychiatric disorders
  Others

Related links

HIV/AIDS

Haney M.: Effects of smoked marihuana in healthy and HIV + marihuana smokers. J Clin Pharmacol 2002; 42: 34S-40S


This article presents data from two avenues of marihuana research. First, the author shows that daily marihuana smoking in healthy individuals produces dependence, as demonstrated by withdrawal symptoms such as increased irritability and depression and decreased food intake. In addition, two antidepressant medications were evaluated to assess their potential effectiveness in the treatment of marihuana withdrawal symptoms: (1) sustained-release bupropion (0, 300 mg/day) and (2) nefazodone (0, 450 mg/day). Research participants were regular marihuana smokers who lived in a residential laboratory in groups of two to four. While inpatients, participants smoked active marihuana (2.8%-3.1% THC) repeatedly for 4 days, followed by 8 to 12 days of placebo marihuana (0.0% THC). Results show that during marihuana abstinence, (1) bupropion increased ratings of irritability, depression, and stomach pain and decreased food intake and sleep quality compared to placebo maintenance, and (2) nefazodone decreased anxiety during marihuana withdrawal but did not alter ratings of irritability and misery. Thus, neither medication showed promise as potential treatments for symptoms of marihuana withdrawal. The second avenue of research focused on the effect of cannabinoids in individuals with muscle mass loss, an indicator of wasting in HIV illness. Given that there are little scientific data contributing to the debates concerning medical marihuana, this study directly compared the effects of oral delta9-THC (0, 10, 20, 30 mg PO) to smoked marihuana (0.0%, 1.8%, 2.8%, 3.9% THC) in HIV + marihuana smokers with muscle mass loss (< 90% body cell mass/height). Multiple dimensions of human behavior were measured, including food intake, mood, and cognitive performance. Drugs were administered using a within-subject, double-blind, staggered, double-dummy design. Participants were free to self-select from a variety of foods throughout most of the session. Preliminary data (n = 9) suggest that oral THC was more effective at increasing food intake, but the volunteers "liked" the effects of smoked marihuana more than the effects of oral THC.

Top

Beal J.E. et al: Dronabinol as a treatment for anorexia associated with weight loss in patients with AIDS. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 1995; 10(2): 89-97


The effects of dronabinol on appetite and weight were evaluated in 139 patients with AIDS-related anorexia and > or = 2.3 kg weight loss in a multi-institutional study. Patients were randomized to receive 2.5 mg dronabinol twice daily or placebo. Patients rated appetite, mood, and nausea by using a 100-mm visual analogue scale 3 days weekly. Efficacy was evaluable in 88 patients. Dronabinol was associated with increased appetite above baseline (38% vs 8% for placebo, P = 0.015), improvement in mood (10% vs -2%, P = 0.06), and decreased nausea (20% vs 7%; P = 0.05). Weight was stable in dronabinol patients, while placebo recipients had a mean loss of 0.4 kg (P = 0.14). Of the dronabinol patients, 22% gained > or = 2 kg, compared with 10.5% of placebo recipients (P = 0.11). Side effects were mostly mild to moderate in severity (euphoria, dizziness, thinking abnormalities); there was no difference in discontinued therapy between dronabinol (8.3%) and placebo (4.5%) recipients. Dronabinol was found to be safe and effective for anorexia associated with weight loss in patients with AIDS.

Top

Bredt BM, et al: Short-term effects of cannabinoids on immune phenotype and function in HIV-1-infected patients. J Clin Pharmacol 2002; 42: 82S-89S.


Cannabinoids, including smoked marihuana and delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) (dronabinol, Marinol), have been used to treat human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV)-associated anorexia and weight loss. Concerns have been raised, however, that these compounds might have adverse effects on the immune system of subjects with HIV infection. To determine whether such effects occur, the authors designed a randomized, prospective, controlled trial comparing the use of marihuana cigarettes (3.95% THC), dronabinol (2.5 mg), and oral placebo in HIV-infected adults taking protease inhibitor-containing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Assays of immune phenotype (including flow cytometric quantitation of T cell subpopulations, B cells, and natural killer [NK] cells) and immunefunction (including assays for induced cytokine production, NK cell function, and lymphoproliferation) were performed at baseline and weekly thereafter. On the basis of these measurements and during this short 21-day study period, few statistically significant effects were noted on immune system phenotypes orfunctions in this patient population.

Top

Abrams DI et al: Short-term effects of cannabinoids in patients with HIV-1 infection: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Aug 19;139(4):258-66.


Cannabinoid use could potentially alter HIV RNA levels by two mechanisms: immune modulation or cannabinoid-protease inhibitor interactions (because both share cytochrome P-450 metabolic pathways).

OBJECTIVE: To determine the short-term effects of smoked marihuana on the viral load in HIV-infected patients.

DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled, 21-day intervention trial.

SETTING: The inpatient General Clinical Research Center at the San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California.

PARTICIPANTS: 67 patients with HIV-1 infection.

INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned to a 3.95%-tetrahydrocannabinol marihuana cigarette, a 2.5-mg dronabinol (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol) capsule, or a placebo capsule three times daily before meals.

MEASUREMENTS: HIV RNA levels, CD4+ and CD8+ cell subsets, and pharmacokinetic analyses of the protease inhibitors.

RESULTS: 62 study participants were eligible for the primary end point (marihuana group, 20 patients; dronabinol group, 22 patients; and placebo group, 20 patients). Baseline HIV RNA level was less than 50 copies/mL for 36 participants (58%), and the median CD4+ cell count was 340 x 109 cells/L. When adjusted for baseline variables, the estimated average effect versus placebo on change in log10 viral load from baseline to day 21 was -0.07 (95% CI, -0.30 to 0.13) for marihuana and -0.04 (CI, -0.20 to 0.14) for dronabinol. The adjusted average changes in viral load in marihuana and dronabinol relative to placebo were -15% (CI, -50% to 34%) and -8% (CI, -37% to 37%), respectively. Neither CD4+ nor CD8+ cell counts appeared to be adversely affected by the cannabinoids.

CONCLUSIONS: Smoked and oral cannabinoids did not seem to be unsafe in people with HIV infection with respect to HIV RNA levels, CD4+ and CD8+ cell counts, or protease inhibitor levels over a 21-day treatment.

Top

Kosel B.W. et al: The effects of cannabinoids on the pharmacokinetics of indinavir and nelfinavir. AIDS 2002; 16: 543-550


BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The use of cannabinoids for appetite stimulation and the management of wasting and antiretroviral side-effects has become a common practice in the care of HIV-infected individuals. We present pharmacokinetic data from a randomized placebo-controlled study designed to evaluate the metabolic effects of smoked marihuana and dronabinol in HIV-infected patients receiving indinavir (IDV) or nelfinavir (NFV).

METHODS: Subjects on stable regimens containing IDV 800 mg every 8 h (n = 28) or NFV 750 mg three time a day (n = 34) were randomized to one of three treatment arms: 3.95% THC marihuana cigarettes, dronabinol 2.5 mg capsules or placebo capsules administered three times daily. Serial blood sampling was performed at baseline and on day 14 of treatment. The changes in NFV and IDV pharmacokinetics were measured as the median percentage change from baseline.

RESULTS: At day 14, the 8-h area under the curve (AUC(8)) changed by -10.2% (P = 0.15), maximum concentration (C(max)) by -17.4% (P = 0.46), and minimum concentration (C(min)) by -12.2% (P = 0.28) for patients in the NFV marihuana arm (n = 11). Similar decreases had occurred by day 14 among patients in the IDV marihuana arm (n = 9): AUC8 had changed by -14.5% (P = 0.074), C(max) by -14.1% (P = 0.039), and C(min) by -33.7% (P = 0.65).

CONCLUSION: Despite a statistically significant decrease in C(max) of IDV in the marihuana arm, the magnitude of changes in IDV and NFV pharmacokinetic parameters in the marihuana arm are likely to have no short-term clinical consequence. The use of marihuana or dronabinol is unlikely to impact antiretroviral efficacy.

Top

Green ST et al, Nabilone as effective therapy for Intractable nausea and vomiting in AIDS. Br. J. clin. Pharmac. 1989; 28 : 494-495


In the scenario described here the patient was fast approaching a terminal state. The rapid relief of the patient’s distressing nausea and vomiting (which was a paramount consideration) following administration of nabilone suggests that the drug is efficaceous in this situation. Currently, the recommended daily dosage during cancer chemotherapy is 1 mg or 2 mg twice daily, but it can be used up to a maximum total daily dose of 6 mg.

Top

Flynn J, Nabilone for the Management of Intractable Nausea and Vomiting in Terminally Staged AIDS. Journal of Palliative Care 1992; 8(2), 46-47


The author agrees with Green et al. that nabilone is a viable therapeutic alternative in the treatment of AIDS-related intractable nausea and vomiting. Its use as a first-line therapy is somewhat restricted by its cost and by its side effects of hypotension and hallucinations. The amelioration of existing hallucinations in the patient may have been serendipitous and warrants further documentation.

Top